Dancil v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al.,
| Roberto Dancil |
| Experian Information Solutions Inc., Equifax, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 2:2018cv00557 |
| March 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| William B. Shubb |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/5/2019 DISMISSING Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. with prejudice. There being no remaining defendants, the entire action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys' fees and costs. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 08/24/18 DISMISSING Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. with prejudice and each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
17
STIPULATION and ORDER dismissing defendant Equifax, Inc. with prejudice 14 , signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/4/2018. Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/7/2018 GRANTING 12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer; Response to complaint due 6/1/2018. No other deadlines shall be affected by this Order. (Fabillaran, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
