Doe v. San Joaquin County et al
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: San Joaquin County, Steve Moore and Danny Swanson
Case Number: 2:2018cv00667
Filed: March 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 35 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/7/2019 EXTENDING Defendants' deadline to respond to 31 First Amended Complaint to 11/18/2019. (Huang, H)
June 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 33 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/13/2019 EXTENDING Time through and including 8/19/2019, for Defendants to File Response to 31 First Amended Complaint. (York, M)
May 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/10/19 GRANTING in PART and DENYING in PART 8 Defendants San Joaquin County and Sheriff Steve Moore's Motion to Dismiss. (Kastilahn, A)
April 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/17/2018 ORDERING that the Plaintiff is PERMITTED to proceed under a pseudonym. The Court finds Plaintiff's need for anonymity outweighs the prejudice to Defendants and the public's interest in knowing Plaintiff's identity; Clerk to issue summons. (Fabillaran, J)
April 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 04/04/18 DENYING 3 Response/Motion without prejudice and ORDERING that Plaintiff has 7 days to file a response to the (#2) Order to Show Cause that thoroughly reviews the balancing test and retaliation factors as outlined in Does I through XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp. (Benson, A.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. San Joaquin County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Represented By: Stanley Goff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: San Joaquin County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steve Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danny Swanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?