Easley v. CDC - California Department of Corrections et al
| Steven Easley |
| CDC - California Department of Corrections, Sacramento Sheriff's Department and Neighborhood Crime Watch |
| 2:2018cv00668 |
| March 28, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/17/2018 RECOMMENDING that the action be dismissed without leave to amend. The Clerk be directed to close this case. IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that all pending discovery, and motion practice in this action are STAYED pending resolution of the findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. CASE STAYED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/12/2018 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED, but with leave to amend. Within 28 days of this order, plaintiff shall file either (a) a first amended complaint in accordance with this order, or (b) a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without prejudice. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
