Humes v. State of California et al
| Jon Humes |
| State of California and Sex and Arson Registry |
| 2:2018cv00695 |
| March 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| John A. Mendez |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 01/15/19 REVOKING Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status per 15 Notice (cc: USCA). (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
7
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/24/2018 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/18/2018 GRANTING 4 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING Clerk of Court to randomly assigned a District judge. Plaintiff to pay the statutory fee of $350. The Sacramento County Jail sha ll collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. District Judge John A. Mendez assigned. The case number on all future filings shall be: 2:18-cv-00695-JAM-CMK. (cc: Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
