Caldwell v. People of the State of California
Petitioner: Derrick R. Caldwell
Respondent: People of the State of California
Case Number: 2:2018cv00712
Filed: March 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/16/2019 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 daysafter being served with these findings and recommendations. (Huang, H)
December 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/5/2018 VACATING 20 Findings and Recommendations, GRANTING 21 Request for Leave to Amend, DISMISSING 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and DENYING AS MOOT 16 Motion to Dismiss. Petitioner is GRANTED 30 days within which to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus. When the amended petition is filed, the court will address petitioner's request for a stay. Petitioner's failure to file an amended petition within 30 days will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Respondent need take no further action until receiving further direction from the court. (Huang, H)
November 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/1/2018 RECOMMENDING that 16 Motion to Dismiss be granted; Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be dismissed; and Petitioner be granted 30 days wi thin which to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus which includes only the claims identified as claims 2 and 3 in his original petition. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. (Huang, H)
August 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/30/2018 ORDERING petitioner to file an opposition to respondent's pending 16 motion to dismiss, or a statement of non-opposition, within 30 days. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Yin, K)
April 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/3/2018 ORDERING Petitioner, within 30 days, to complete and return the IFP form to the court or submit the $5.00 filing fee. (Henshaw, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caldwell v. People of the State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Derrick R. Caldwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: People of the State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?