Martinez v. Ford Motor Co.
Ford Motor Company and Dominic Martinez |
2:2018cv00837 |
April 5, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
Morrison C England |
Gregory G Hollows |
John A Mendez |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA case number 2:18-cv-07706. (Robles, S) |
Filing 9 MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California. ELECTRONIC TRANSFER SENT. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 04/27/18 GRANTING #5 Ex Parte Application; this case is STAYED pending a final decision by the JPML whether to transfer this case for inclusion in the MDL. All filing deadlines and hearing dates are VACATED. (Benson, A.) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order served on Michael D. Resnick NCAED. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 7 RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/23/2018 REASSIGNING this case to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for all further proceedings. Any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. New Case Number: 2:18-cv-00837-JAM-AC. (York, M) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order served on Michael D. Resnick NCAED. (York, M) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #5 Ex Parte Application, #4 Notice of Related Case - ATY. (Efstratis, Harry) |
Filing 5 EX PARTE APPLICATION by Ford Motor Company for Stay All Proceedings and Deadlines Pending Determination of Transfer for Coordination with Multidistrict Litigation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Efstratis, Harry) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of RELATED CASE 2:18-cv-02006-JAM-AC by Ford Motor Company. (Efstratis, Harry) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #1 Notice of Removal,. (Efstratis, Harry) |
Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento Superior Court, case number 34-2018-00228125 by Ford Motor Co. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A , #2 Exhibit B , #3 Certificate of Interested Entities, #4 Certificate of Service, #5 Declaration of Counsel, #6 Civil Cover sheet)(Efstratis, Harry) |
PAYMENT for Civil Case filing fee in the amount of $ 400, receipt number 0972-7595396. (Efstratis, Harry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Martinez v. Ford Motor Co. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
Represented By: | Harry Paul Efstratis |
Represented By: | Kristina Obradovic Lambert |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Dominic Martinez | |
Represented By: | Michael D. Resnick, NCAED |
Represented By: | Allen-Michael D. Resnick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.