Reyes v. City of Fairfield et al
| Christian Reyes |
| City of Fairfield and Robert Murray |
| 2:2018cv00883 |
| April 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Deborah Barnes |
| John A. Mendez |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/21/2020 ADOPTING 41 Findings and Recommendations in full; Plaintiff's 5/14/2018 Amended Complaint 8 is DISMISSED without prejudice; and This Action is CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/18/2020 ORDERING that the 2/21/2020 status conference is VACATED. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's 8 Amended Complaint be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez.Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/23/2020 ORDERING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing within 14 days of the date of this order as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Status Conference is CONTINUED to 2/21/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Plaintiff shall file a status report on or before 2/7/2020 and defendant shall file a status report on or before 2/14/2020. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/27/2019 SETTING a Status Conference for 1/31/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. All parties are required to appear at the Status Conference, either by counsel or, if proceeding in propria persona, on his or her own behalf. Any party may appear at the status conference telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, courtroom deputy. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before 1/17/2020, and defendants shall file and serve a status report on or before 1/24/2020. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
34
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/18/2019 MODIFYING scheduling order: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 2/3/2020; Discovery shall be completed by 3/20/2020; Dispositive Motions filed by 4/21/2020; Joint pretrial statement filed by 7/17/2020; Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/24/2020 at 10:00 AM; Jury Trial set for 9/14/2020 at 09:00 AM. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
32
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 03/04/19 MODIFIES the Scheduling Order as follows: Discovery due by 9/20/2019; Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 8/2/2019 with any supplemental or rebuttal experts due 08/16/19; D ispositive Motions filed by 10/22/2019 and heard 11/19/19; Joint Pretrial Statement due 01/10/20; Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/17/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez and Jury Trial set for 3/2/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
30
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/1/19. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/13/2018 ORDERING Jury Trial Reset for 1/6/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
