Woolsey v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Virgie Woolsey |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2018cv00924 |
| April 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/23/2020 GRANTING 23 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $6,510.69 under the EAJA, 28:2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28:1920, 2412(d). (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/14/20 ORDERING that, within 14 days of this order defendant shall file either a stipulation and proposed order resolving plaintiff's fee motion, or an opposition in response to plaintiff's motion. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/24/2019 GRANTING Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment; DENYING the Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment; REMANDING the matter for further administrative proceedings consistent with this order; and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in plaintiff's favor. CASE CLOSED.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/27/19 EXTENDING time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment to 3/28/2019. Plaintiff shall file any reply on or before 4/11/2019. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/18/19 GRANTING 15 Motion for Extension of Time; plaintiff has until 01/29/19 to file her Motion for Summary Judgment. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/17/2018 GRANTING 3 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING the clerk to issue process. Within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal t he required documents and shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than sixty (60) days from the date of this order. (Washington, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woolsey v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Virgie Woolsey | |
| Represented By: | Bess Murchison Brewer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
