Canfield v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Plaintiff: Donald Canfield
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Narinder Saukhla, J. Lewis, Joseph Bick and Donald Mathis
Case Number: 2:2018cv01092
Filed: May 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Solano
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/15/22 ADOPTING 57 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 49 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue final judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Kaminski, H)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 8/15/2022 DENYING 56 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Huang, H)
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 57 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/29/22 RECOMMENDING that defendant's unopposed motion for summary judgment 49 be granted. Motion 49 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
October 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/25/21 GRANTING 46 Motion to opt out of ADR and LIFTING the STAY of this action. The parties may conduct discovery consistent with the Courts October 19, 2020, scheduling order through November 9, 2021. Dispositive motions are due to be filed within 90 days of this date. (Plummer, M)
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 09/13/21. Any motion to opt out of the Post-screening ADR Project shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. (Plummer, M)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/29/2021 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 43 motion to compel. (Yin, K)
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 5/18/2021 GRANTING defendants' 41 unopposed motion for a first modification of the court's scheduling order. The parties may conduct discovery until 9/20/2021. All dispositive motions shall be filed within 90 days after the discovery cut-off date specified above. (Yin, K)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/19/20 DENYING 39 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Plummer, M)
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/18/19 GRANTING 26 Motion; plaintiff may file a third amended complaint within 30 days. (Benson, A.)
October 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/03/19 ORDERING plaintiff may file a third amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Plummer, M)
September 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/25/2019 DENYING plaintiff's 18 second request for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
September 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/6/2019 VACATING the 16 findings and recommendations issued 6/18/2019 and DENYING as unnecessary plaintiff's 19 motion for leave to amend. This action shall proceed on plaintiff's 7/31/2019 pleading which the Clerk shall designate as the second amended complaint. (Yin, K)
June 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/18/2019 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
June 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 6/5/2019 DENYING plaintiff's 13 request for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
April 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 4/8/2019 DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend; and plaintiff shall file a first amended complaint within 30 days. (Yin, K)
August 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/2/2018 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Donald Canfield. Plaintiff to pay the statutory filing fee of $350. The Director of the CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Canfield v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Canfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Narinder Saukhla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Bick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald Mathis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?