Rutledge v. Susanville Police Department

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Eastern District Rutledge v. Susanville Police Department

Rutledge v. Susanville Police Department

Petitioner:	Travis Rutledge
Respondent:	Susanville Police Department
Case Number:	2:2018cv01100
Filed:	May 2, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Lassen
Presiding Judge:	Allison Claire
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 14, 2019	Filing 9 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/13/19 GRANTING 6 Motion to Proceed IFP. The clerk of court shall randomly assign a District Court Judge to this action. The clerk of court is directed to serv e a copy of the petition filed in this case together with a copy of these findings and recommendations on the Attorney General of the State of California. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be simmarily dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The court decline to issue the certificate of appealability. Assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
May 23, 2018	Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/22/2018 ORDERING Petitioner to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, and affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. (Henshaw, R)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 14, 2019

Filing 9 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/13/19 GRANTING 6 Motion to Proceed IFP. The clerk of court shall randomly assign a District Court Judge to this action. The clerk of court is directed to serv e a copy of the petition filed in this case together with a copy of these findings and recommendations on the Attorney General of the State of California. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be simmarily dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The court decline to issue the certificate of appealability. Assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)

May 23, 2018

Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/22/2018 ORDERING Petitioner to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, and affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. (Henshaw, R)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rutledge v. Susanville Police Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Travis Rutledge
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Susanville Police Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?