Fernandez v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Frank Fernandez
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. and Eli Lilly & Company
Case Number: 2:2018cv01142
Filed: May 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Presiding Judge: Troy L. Nunley
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/15/2018 IT IS SO ORDERED The hearing on Motion to Dismiss 20 , and Motion to Stay 22 , is CONTINUED to 12/6/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley; Plaintiff's response due by 11/6/2018; and Defendants reply due by 11/22/2018. (Reader, L)
September 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/14/18, ORDERING that the hearing on the 20 Motion to Dismiss and 22 Motion to Stay is CONTINUED to 11/15/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Plaintiff's response is due on or before 10/11/18 and defendants' replies are due on or before 11/1/2018. (Kastilahn, A)
August 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/16/18: Hearing as to 20 Motion to Dismiss, 22 Motion to Stay RESET for 10/18/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Kaminski, H)
July 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/16/18, ORDERING that the hearing as to 20 Motion to Dismiss, 22 Motion to Stay is CONTINUED to 9/6/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Plaintiff's response to the motions is due on or before 8/13/2018, and Defendants' replies are due on or before 8/30/2018. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fernandez v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank Fernandez
Represented By: Pedram Esfandiary
Represented By: Robert Brent Wisner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc.
Represented By: Darryl Anderson, PHV
Represented By: Su-Lyn Combs
Represented By: D'Lesli Davis, PHV
Represented By: Amanda Villalobos
Represented By: Geraldine Young, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eli Lilly & Company
Represented By: Darryl Anderson, PHV
Represented By: Su-Lyn Combs
Represented By: D'Lesli Davis, PHV
Represented By: Amanda Villalobos
Represented By: Geraldine Young, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?