Boddie v. Martel et al
Plaintiff: Alexander Boddie
Defendant: Michael Martel, J. Dominguez and M. Voong
Case Number: 2:2018cv01196
Filed: May 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/14/2020 ADOPTING IN FULL 13 Findings and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey a court order. CASE CLOSED. (Tupolo, A)
June 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/09/2020 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a District Judge. District Judge Troy L. Nunley added. It is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey a court order. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. (Tupolo, A)
April 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/27/2020 ORDERING, within 30 days, plaintiff shall inform the court as to why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey a court order. Plaintiff is warned that failure to respond to this order within the time specified may result in a recommendations that this case be dismissed. (Yin, K) Modified on 4/27/2020 (Yin, K).
March 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/09/20 DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP and GRANTING 6 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. All fees shall be collecte d in accordance with the court's CDC order filed concurrently herewith. Plaintiff's complaint 1 fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and will not be served. Within 30 days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff may file a first amended complaint. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boddie v. Martel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexander Boddie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Martel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Dominguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Voong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?