Aleem v. Lizarraga et al
Farooq Abdul Aleem |
Joe Lizarraga, B. Holmes, K. Costa and M. Voong |
2:2018cv01211 |
May 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Deborah Barnes |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/21/19 VACATING 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING as MOOT 15 Motion for Extension of time and TERMINATING 16 Motion to Dismiss. CASE CLOSED.(Kaminski, H) |
Filing 14 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/29/2019 ORDERING a district judge be assigned to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim, and plaintiff's request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction be denied. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Farooq Abdul Aleem signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/29/2018. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward t o the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.