Strong v. City of Vallejo et al
| Robert Strong |
| City of Vallejo, Jarrett Tonn and Andrew Bidou |
| 2:2018cv01246 |
| May 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| William B. Shubb |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/22/2020 ORDERING that defendants' 14 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to Claim One as against the City of Vallejo and Claims Two, Five, and Six of the Complaint as against all defendants. Plaintiff 15 and defendants' 14 motions for summary judgment are DENIED with respect to Claim One as against defendant Tonn and Claims Three, Four, and Seven. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
31
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/15/2020 ORDERING a Further Status Conference set for 8/31/2020 at 1:30 p.m. A joint status report re further proceedings and proposed pretrial deadlines and trial dates shall be filed no later than 8/17/2020. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/12/2020: Within 14 days from the date of this order, counsel for plaintiff shall file a brief which sets forth all arguments, and which cites to and thoroughly discusses all caselaw or other authority that may support those arguments, in opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss each claim which plaintiff does not agree to voluntarily dismiss. Defendant may have 7 days to reply to such brief. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/4/2020: It is not clear from plaintiff's failure to address defendants' motion for summary judgment with regard to plaintiff's state law claims three through seven or plaintiff's Monell claim in the second cause of action what plaintiff's position is regarding those claims. Accordingly, within seven days from the date of this order counsel for plaintiff shall inform the court whether he concedes the merits of defendants' motion with regard to those claims or whether he just expects the court to do the research itself. (Kirksey Smith, K)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/4/2018 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. (Hunt, G)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
