Houston v. Baker
| William Houston |
| Baker |
| 2:2018cv01271 |
| May 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 2/1/2021 ORDERING Case set for Settlement Conference on 4/15/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston; ORDERING at least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff to submit to Defendant via fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful settlement demand; ORDERING thereafter, no later than 14 days before the settlement conference, Defendant to respond via fox or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate; and ORDERING if settlement is not achieved, at least 5 court days before the settlement conference, parties to submit directly to Chambers a Confidential Settlement Statement. (cc: JLT) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
78
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/30/2020 APPROVING the parties' stipulated extension to file objections to pretrial order and amended witness list to 12/24/2020.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/30/2020 APPOINTING Brian Curtis McComas as counsel for William Houston. Appointed counsel shall notify Sujean Park if he has any questions related to the appointment. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on Brian C. McComas, Law Office of B.C. McComas, 77 Van Ness Ave., Suite 101, PMB 1605, San Francisco, CA 94102.(Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/14/20 ORDERING the Custodian to produce William Houston by zoom video conference on 11/06/20 at 10:30 a.m. in courtroom 3 before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Custodian is ordered to notify the court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. The clerk of court shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian. (cc: I.T. Dept, Sacramento)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/24/20 DENYING 57 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/27/2020 GRANTING 53 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this order is served to file his pretrial statement. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER DIRECTING FILING OF PRETRIAL STATEMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/6/2020 ORDERING, within 30 days, plaintiff shall file and serve a pretrial statement and any affidavits necessary to obtain the attendance of witnesses at trial. Defendant shall file a pretrial statement no later than 30 days after the filing of plaintiff's statement. Pretrial conference will be conducted on the file only. The date for jury trial before the district judge will be set in the pretrial order.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/05/20 DENYING 48 Motion for mandatory phone access. The parties to this action shall each, no later than 30 days from the date of the order, submit confidential statements as described belo w. The confidential statements shall not be served on the opposing party or filed with the court, but instead, delivered by mail, fax, email or personal delivery to the courts Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) division at the address, fax number or email address below and marked Confidential. (cc: ADR Director) (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/8/2019 GRANTING IN PART 40 Motion to Compel, as described in this order. Defendant to supplement his responses as required herein within 14 days from the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/16/2019 DENYING 25 Plaintiff's 4/5/2019 request, construed as a Motion for Recusal. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of William Houston signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/18/18. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Houston v. Baker | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Houston | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Baker | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
