Ford v. Ford Motor Company
Kevin Ford |
Ford Motor Company |
2:2018cv01320 |
May 22, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Kendall J Newman |
William B Shubb |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA case number 2:18-cv-05343. (Robles, S) |
Filing 7 MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER (TEXT ONLY): The parties are hereby notified that #3 Defendant's Ex Parte Application for Stay Pending MDL determination must be properly filed as a noticed motion pursuant to Local Rule 230(b). The document is therefore stricken. As of today's date, the court's next available motion date is June 25, 2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Defendant is, therefore, instructed to re-file said application as a noticed motion, and is further instructed to review the Local Rules and refer to Judge Shubb's standard information on the court's website for available hearing dates and other pertinent information. (Kirksey Smith, K) |
Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/22/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Hunt, G) |
Filing 4 [DISREGARD-INCORRECTLY SCHEDULED] CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/9/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Hunt, G) Modified on 5/22/2018 (Hunt, G). |
Filing 3 ***DISREGARD; MINUTE ORDER DOCKET #6***EX PARTE APPLICATION by Ford Motor Company for staying all proceedings and deadlines pending determination of inclusion in multidistrict litigation pending in this district (MDL 2814). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dye, Stephen) Modified on 5/22/2018 (Kirksey Smith, K). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of RELATED CASE MDL 2814 by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Dye, Stephen) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento, case number 34-2018-00231071-CU-BC-GDS by Ford Motor Company . (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7672781) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons)(Dye, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ford v. Ford Motor Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
Represented By: | Stephen H. Dye |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kevin Ford | |
Represented By: | Allen-Michael D. Resnick |
Represented By: | John Neil Gieleghem |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.