Ford v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Kevin Ford
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 2:2018cv01320
Filed: May 22, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kendall J Newman
Referring Judge: William B Shubb
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2018 OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA case number 2:18-cv-05343. (Robles, S)
June 18, 2018 Filing 7 MDL ORDER. CASE TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)
May 22, 2018 Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER (TEXT ONLY): The parties are hereby notified that #3 Defendant's Ex Parte Application for Stay Pending MDL determination must be properly filed as a noticed motion pursuant to Local Rule 230(b). The document is therefore stricken. As of today's date, the court's next available motion date is June 25, 2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Defendant is, therefore, instructed to re-file said application as a noticed motion, and is further instructed to review the Local Rules and refer to Judge Shubb's standard information on the court's website for available hearing dates and other pertinent information. (Kirksey Smith, K)
May 22, 2018 Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/22/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Hunt, G)
May 22, 2018 Filing 4 [DISREGARD-INCORRECTLY SCHEDULED] CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 10/9/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Hunt, G) Modified on 5/22/2018 (Hunt, G).
May 22, 2018 Filing 3 ***DISREGARD; MINUTE ORDER DOCKET #6***EX PARTE APPLICATION by Ford Motor Company for staying all proceedings and deadlines pending determination of inclusion in multidistrict litigation pending in this district (MDL 2814). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Dye, Stephen) Modified on 5/22/2018 (Kirksey Smith, K).
May 22, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of RELATED CASE MDL 2814 by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Dye, Stephen)
May 22, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento, case number 34-2018-00231071-CU-BC-GDS by Ford Motor Company . (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7672781) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons)(Dye, Stephen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ford v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Stephen H. Dye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Ford
Represented By: Allen-Michael D. Resnick
Represented By: John Neil Gieleghem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?