Moore v. Frauenheim
| Paul Moore |
| Scott Frauenheim |
| 2:2018cv01699 |
| June 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Colusa |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 2/25/21 DISCHARGING 28 Order to Show Cause. Petitioner is reminded that he must proceed diligently to pursue his state court remedies and must file a status report every 90 days advising the court of the status of the state court proceedings.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 1/19/21 ORDERING petitioner is ordered to show cause within 21 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/9/2020 ORDERING petitioner must proceed diligently to pursue his state court remedies and must file a status report every 90 days advising the court of the status of the state court proceedings; and petitioner's failure to comply with this order may result in an order vacating the stay. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/5/19 ADOPTING 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; GRANTING 3 Motion to Stay. DENYING 17 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/20/18 ORDERING the hearing on respondent's motion to dismiss, currently set for 1/23/19 is VACATED. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's motion to st ay 3 be granted. Further, given that respondent's motion to dismiss is predicated entirely on the inclusion of unexhausted claims in the current petition 17 - the status of which the stay would potentially address - it is recommended that the motion be denied without prejudice. Motions 3 , 17 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/13/2018 GRANTING 15 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondents have up to and including 9/11/2018 to file a responsive pleading to 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the SACRAMENTO Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/11/2018. Old Case Number 1:18-cv-00794-SKO(HC). (Sant Agata, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moore v. Frauenheim | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Paul Moore | |
| Represented By: | Clifford Gardner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Scott Frauenheim | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
