Singanonh v. Fine et al
Plaintiff: Tiengkham Singanonh
Defendant: R. Fine, S. Cagle and S. Peery
Case Number: 2:2018cv01824
Filed: June 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/23/2022 ADOPTING 59 The Findings and Recommendations in full; Defendant's 27 Motion for monetary sanctions, is DENIED; Defendant's 57 Motion for terminating sanction is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to comply with a court order; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 59 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/29/21 RECOMMENDING that defendant's motion for monetary sanctions 57 be denied. Defendant's motion for terminating sanctions 57 be granted. This action be dismissed with prejudice, for failure to comply with a court order. Motion 57 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/26/21 ORDERING that within 21 days of the service of this order, plaintiff shall file and serve an opposition to the motion for sanctions or a statement of non-opposition.(Plummer, M)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/8/2021 GRANTING defendant's 55 motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order. The 9/28/2021 dispositive motions deadline is vacated and will be reset, as necessary, upon resolution of the pending discovery issues. (Yin, K)
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/31/21 GRANTING 52 Motion to Compel. Within 14 days of the service of this order, plaintiff must fully respond to defendants interrogatories and requests for production without objection. Defendant may file a motion for sanctions within 30 days of the service of this order if plaintiff fails to comply with this order. (Plummer, M)
July 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/30/21 ORDERING that within 21 days of the service of this order plaintiff shall file a response to defendants motion to compel.(Plummer, M)
May 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/10/21 GRANTING 50 Request for clarification. The extension of the discovery deadline includes defendants deadline to take plaintiffs deposition and defendant shall have until July 6, 2021, to conduct plaintiffs deposition and file any necessary motions to compel related to the taking of plaintiffs deposition. (Plummer, M)
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/29/2021 DENYING defendants 47 motion to compel and GRANTING defendants 48 motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order to the extent the discovery and dispositive motion deadlines ar e modified as followed: a. The 3/1/2021, deadline to serve requests pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 31 (deposition by written question), 33 (interrogatories), 34 (production of documents), or 36 (admissions) is re-opened for the limited purpose of allowi ng defendant to re-serve his written requests for discovery. b. Defendant may re-serve his written requests for discovery by 5/7/2021. c. Any motions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed by 7/6/2021. d. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before 9/28/2021. The Clerk shall update the docket entry for ECF No. 42 to reflect that plaintiff's address is 864 E. Belgravia Ave., Apt. #D, Fresno, CA 93706. (Yin, K)
December 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/15/20 ORDERING that within 21 days of the filing of this order, defendants shall file an answer to the first amended complaint.(Plummer, M)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/2/20 ADOPTING 40 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 33 Motion to Dismiss and 38 Motion to Amend the complaint. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further pretrial proceedings as provided by this court's Local Rules. (Kaminski, H)
May 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/6/2020 GRANTING ECF No. 33-2 Request for Judicial Notice to the extent the court takes notice of the existence of Plaintiff's 2 rules violation reports and de terminate sentence worksheet and their contents; GRANTING ECF No. 34 at 3-4 Request for Judicial Notice of the restoration of Plaintiff's good-time credits in relation to the 2/1/2018 disciplinary violation; DENYING 35 Request that Court take Judicial Notice of Plaintiff's medical records; and RECOMMENDING 33 Motion to Dismiss be denied and 38 Motion to Amend the Complaint to Add Supplemental Claim be denied. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
August 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/31/19 DENYING 29 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Plummer, M)
July 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 07/18/19 DISMISSING defendants Peery, Hanson, Lee, Voong, Cagle, Gamberg, Hardwood, Rodriguez and Stalter and the state tort claims against defendant Fine without leave to amend. Case REFERRED back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Benson, A.)
July 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER AND WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/12/2019 ORDERING the custodian to produce Tiengkham Noy Singanonh BC-1951, to appear by video conference before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newma n on 10/1/2019 at 1:30 p.m.; custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ; the Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Warden an d by fax on the Litigation Coordinator; and Counsel for defendants shall confirm with the prison no less than two days prior to the settlement conference that the prison's video conference equipment will connect to the court's system. (cc: KJN, I.T. Dept.) (Yin, K)
June 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/18/2019 REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS. Plaintiff shall file the attached notice re settlement conference within 30 days of this order. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. (Henshaw, R)
April 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/30/2019 DENYING plaintiff's 12 motion for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
April 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/10/2019 ORDERING plaintiff shall have 30 days to file an amended complaint as outlined in the 3/29/2019 screening order. The Clerk shall send plaintiff a prisoner complaint form. (Yin, K)
March 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Tiengkham Singanonh signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/28/2019. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward t o the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Singanonh v. Fine et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiengkham Singanonh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Fine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Cagle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. Peery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?