Brooke v. Manav Investment, LLC
| Theresa Brooke |
| Manav Investment, LLC and Manav Investment, LLC a California limited liability company Doing business as Quality Inn Convention Center |
| 2:2018cv01825 |
| June 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| John A Mendez |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER by Theresa Brooke. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Strojnik, Peter) Modified on 8/15/2018 (Washington, S). |
| Filing 4 ANSWER by Manav Investment, LLC. Attorney Heath, Michael Timothy added.(Heath, Michael) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Manav Investment, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Peter Kristofer Strojnik* *The Strojnik Firm LLC* *2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 700* *Phoenix, AZ 85016*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Manav Investment, LLC by Theresa Brooke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Strojnik, Peter) |
| RECEIPT number 0972-7722946 for $400.00 from Strojnik, Peter Kristofer. (Benson, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
