O1 Communications, Inc. v. MCI Communications Services Inc. et al
O1 Communications, Inc. |
Verizon Select Services Inc. and MCI Communications Services Inc. |
2:2018cv01950 |
July 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
El Dorado |
Deborah Barnes |
John A Mendez |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/23/2019. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 39 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Protective Order Governing Confidential Information by MCI Communications Services Inc., Verizon Select Services Inc.. (Angstreich, Scott) |
Filing 38 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/6/19 MODIFYING the Designation of Expert Witnesses deadline to 3/9/20. (Coll, A) |
Filing 37 JOINT OBJECTIONS by Defendants MCI Communications Services Inc., Verizon Select Services Inc. to #36 Scheduling Order. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Angstreich, Scott) Modified on 6/7/2019 (Kaminski, H). |
Filing 36 STATUS (PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/31/2019 ORDERING: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 3/27/2020; Supplemental disclosure and disclosure of any rebuttal experts due by 4/10/2020; Discovery due by 5/29/2020; Dispositive Motions filed by 7/14/2020; Hearing on such motions shall be on 8/11/2020 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez; a Final Pretrial Conference is set for 9/25/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez; a Court Trial is set for 12/2/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez; This Status Order will become final without further Order of Court unless objection is lodged within 7 days of the date of the filing of this Order. (Washington, S) |
Filing 35 JOINT STATUS REPORT by O1 Communications, Inc.. (Taff-Rice, Anita) |
Filing 34 MINUTE ORDER: The parties shall file an updated joint status report on or before May 31, 2019. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) (Vine, H) |
Filing 33 ANSWER to #32 Counterclaim by O1 Communications, Inc. (Taff-Rice, Anita) Modified on 3/21/2019 (Huang, H). |
Filing 32 ANSWER, COUNTERCLAIM against O1 Communications, Inc. by Verizon Select Services Inc., MCI Communications Services Inc.(Horvitz, Kevin) Modified on 3/21/2019 (Huang, H). |
Filing 31 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/18/2019 DENYING the defendants' #14 Motion to Stay the plaintiff's breach of contract claim (Count I); GRANTING WITH PREJUDICE the defendants' #14 Motion to Dismiss the plaintiff's cause of action for violation of Section 201 of the Communications Act (Count II); GRANTING WITHOUT PREJUDICE the defendants' #14 Motion to Dismiss the plaintiff's UCL claim (Count III); ORDERING the plaintiff to file a second amended complaint amending the UCL claim, if it so desires, within 20 days; ORDERING the defendants to respond to said complaint 20 days thereafter. (Michel, G.) |
Filing 30 MINUTE ORDER: The hearing on the motion(s) now calendared for January 8, 2019 is/are ordered submitted without appearance and without argument pursuant to Local Rule 230 (g). If the Court subsequently concludes that oral argument is necessary, a hearing will be set and the parties notified accordingly. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY)(Vine, H) |
Filing 29 REPLY by MCI Communications Services Inc., Verizon Select Services Inc. in SUPPORT of #14 Motion to Stay and Motion to Dismiss. (Horvitz, PHV, Kevin) |
Filing 28 RESPONSE by O1 Communications, Inc. to #14 Motion to Stay and Motion to Dismiss. (Taff-Rice, Anita) Modified on 12/17/2018 (Benson, A.). |
Filing 27 JOINT STATUS REPORT by O1 Communications, Inc. (Taff-Rice, Anita) |
Filing 26 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/1/2018 GRANTING #25 Motion for Extension The deadline for filing the joint status report is EXTENDED to 11/19/2018. (Washington, S) |
Filing 25 MOTION for 13-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to File Joint Status Report by MCI Communications Services Inc., Verizon Select Services Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Angstreich, Scott) |
Filing 24 SEALING ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/29/2018 GRANTING the motion to SEAL. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 23 PROPOSED ORDER re Request to Redact or Seal Specific Confidential Information. re #22 Request, #21 Notice of Request to Seal Document(s) by O1 Communications, Inc. (Taff-Rice, Anita) Modified on 10/29/2018 (Reader, L). |
Filing 22 REQUEST for Redact or Seal Specific Information. re #21 Notice of Request to Seal Document(s) filed by O1 Communications, Inc. (Taff-Rice, Anita) Modified on 10/29/2018 (Reader, L). |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Request to Seal Document(s) pursuant to L.R. 141 by O1 Communications, Inc.. (Taff-Rice, Anita) |
Filing 20 SEALED EVENT (Attachments: #1 Part 2) (York, M) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/15/2018 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED The following information is hereby ORDERED SEALED and redacted from the public record: The dollar sum located on Page 2, 1(a) Confidential Settlement Agreement and Release between Verizon Services Corp. and O1 Communications, Inc., dated 2/3/2015. (Reader, L) |
Filing 18 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by MCI Communications Services Inc., Verizon Select Services Inc.. (Baker, Meghan) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Request to Seal Document(s) pursuant to L.R. 141 by MCI Communications Services Inc., Verizon Select Services Inc.. (Baker, Meghan) |
Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Verizon Select Services Inc.. (Baker, Meghan) |
Filing 15 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant MCI Communications Services Inc.. (Baker, Meghan) |
Filing 14 MOTION to STAY and MOTION to DISMISS by MCI Communications Services Inc., Verizon Select Services Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 1/8/2019 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Points and Authorities, #2 Exhibit)(Baker, Meghan) Modified on 10/15/2018 (Kastilahn, A). |
Filing 13 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: MCI Communications Services, Inc. served on 9/7/2018; Verizon Select Services, Inc. served on 9/7/2018. (Taff-Rice, Anita) Modified on 10/9/2018 (Washington, S). |
Filing 12 PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/2/2018 ORDERING attorney Kevin D. Horvitz, PHV added for MCI Communications Services Inc. and Verizon Select Services Inc. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 11 PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/2/2018 ORDERING attorney Scott H. Angstreich, PHV added for MCI Communications Services Inc. and Verizon Select Services Inc. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 10 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by MCI Communications Services Inc., Verizon Select Services Inc. for attorney Kevin D. Horvitz to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-7898584) (Attachments: #1 Notice Certificate of Good Standing)(Baker, Meghan) |
Filing 9 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by MCI Communications Services Inc., Verizon Select Services Inc. for attorney Scott H. Angstreich to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-7898571) (Attachments: #1 Notice Certificate of Good Standing)(Baker, Meghan) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time for Defendants to File Responsive Pleading by MCI Communications Services Inc., Verizon Select Services Inc.. Attorney Baker, Meghan M. added. (Baker, Meghan) |
Filing 7 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by O1 Communications, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Taff-Rice, Anita) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs Request to Seal Documents. ECF No. 2. A confidentiality agreement between the parties does not constitute good cause to rebut the presumption in favor of access to court records. See Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003); Select Portfolio Servicing v. Valentino, No. C 12-0334 SI, 2013 WL 1800039, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2013) (parties agreement among themselves to make a settlement agreement confidential is not good cause to seal documents). Nor do the documents themselves contain obviously sensitive information from which the Court might conclude sealing is warranted. Accordingly, Plaintiffs Request to Seal Documents is DENIED. (TEXT ENTRY ONLY) (Vine, H) |
Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Washington, S) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *MCI Communications Services Inc., Verizon Select Services Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Anita Taff-Rice* *iCommLaw* *1547 Palos Verdes #298* *Walnut Creek, CA 94597*. (Washington, S) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET by O1 Communications, Inc. (Taff-Rice, Anita) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Request to Seal Document(s) pursuant to L.R. 141 by O1 Communications, Inc.. (Taff-Rice, Anita) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Redacted against All Defendants by O1 Communications, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7762496) (Taff-Rice, Anita) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.