Thomas v. O'Mar, et al.
| O'Mar, Green, Bick, Harris, Collins, - Strickland, Harmon, Harless, Gilliard, Horch, Gatr and County of Solano |
| 2:2018cv02068 |
| July 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Kings |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/26/2018 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a US District Judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/15/18 DIRECTING plaintiff shall submit a complaint limited to the claims that arose at the California Medical Facility within 30 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the individuals listed in the Declaration of Service filed in Thomas v. Bick, No. 2:16-cv-1425-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. June 12, 2018), ECF No. 39.(Coll, A)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER dismissing certain claims and transferring certain claims for venue 42 signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/27/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
