(PC) Kyle v. Jones
| Raymond Kyle |
| Scott Jones |
| 2:2018cv02143 |
| August 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| John A Mendez |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/26/2018 DIRECTING Clerk of Court to randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Order and Findings and Recommendations, this case has been assigned to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. The new case number is: 2:18-cv-2143 JAM EFB (PC). (Henshaw, R) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order and Findings and Recommendations served on Raymond Kyle. (Henshaw, R) |
| RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents and #4 Order re-served on Raymond Kyle to 8679 Fallbrook Way address listed on page 1 of Complaint (address updated on docket). (Henshaw, R) |
| MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Return to Sender - Not Deliverable as addressed - unable to forward: #4 Order, sent to Raymond Kyle. Notice of Change of Address due by 10/29/2018. (Washington, S) |
| MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Return to Sender - Not Deliverable as addressed - unable to forward: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider sent to Raymond Kyle. Notice of Change of Address due by 10/29/2018. (Washington, S) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/8/2018 ORDERING Plaintiff's complaint shall be disregarded as it was not signed. Within 30 days, plaintiff may file a complaint that is signed. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute.(Cannarozzi, N)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on Raymond Kyle. (Cannarozzi, N) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 9/10/2018 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Becknal, R) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Raymond Kyle. (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Raymond Kyle. (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Scott Jones by Raymond Kyle.(Becknal, R) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) Kyle v. Jones | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Raymond Kyle | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Scott Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
