Brooke v. Sac Hospitality, LLC
Theresa Brooke |
Sac Hospitality, LLC and Sac Hospitality, LLC Doing business as Hilton Sacramento Arden West |
2:2018cv02147 |
August 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
Troy L Nunley |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Sac Hospitality, LLC. Attorney Singh, Shalend Shane added.(Singh, Shalend) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to *Sac Hospitality, LLC* (Benson, A.) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Sac Hospitality, LLC by Theresa Brooke. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Strojnik, Peter) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Sac Hospitality, LLC served on 8/27/2018, answer due 9/17/2018. (Strojnik, Peter) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Sac Hospitality, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Peter Kristofer Strojnik* *The Strojnik Firm LLC* *2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 700* *Phoenix, AZ 85016*. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sac Hospitality, LLC by Theresa Brooke. Attorney Strojnik, Peter Kristofer added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7798283) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Strojnik, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.