(HC) Gasner v. Arnold
| Michael Gasner |
| E. Arnold |
| 2:2018cv02151 |
| August 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/2/18 GRANTING the Petitioner's request for an extension of time (ECF No. #8 ); and Petitioner is granted forty-five days to file objections to the court's September 17, 2018 findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order served on Michael Gasner. (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for 45-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to file objections to #7 Findings and Recommendations by Michael Gasner. (Huang, H) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/17/2018 GRANTING #4 Motion to Proceed IFP and RECOMMENDING #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be summarily dismissed and this case be closed. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order and Findings and Recommendations served on Michael Gasner. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY); pursuant to Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge #5 , this case has been assigned to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. The new case number is: 2:18-cv-2151 KJM CKD (HC). (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, served on Michael Gasner. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 5 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Michael Gasner. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Michael Gasner. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/9/2018 ORDERING Petitioner to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP application served on Michael Gasner. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 9/10/2018. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (York, M) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Michael Gasner. (York, M) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against E. Arnold by Michael Gasner.(York, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Gasner v. Arnold | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: E. Arnold | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael Gasner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
