(HC) Smith v. People of the State of California
| Granville William Smith, IV |
| People of the State of California |
| 2:2018cv02212 |
| August 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Allison Claire |
| John A Mendez |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Granville William Smith, IV. (Coll, A) |
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/2/18 GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension. Petitioner is GRANTED an additional 30 days, up to 11/5/18, to file his IFP. (Coll, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order served on Granville William Smith IV. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for 30-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to file application to proceed in forma pauperis as per #6 Order by Granville William Smith, IV. (Huang, H) Modified on 10/2/2018 (Plummer, M). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/04/18 ORDERING petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an application in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Plummer, M) Modified on 10/2/2018 (Plummer, M).
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order, and prisoner IFP form served on Granville William Smith IV. (Plummer, M) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge, this case has been assigned to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. The new case number is: 2:18-cv-2212-JAM-AC. (Washington, S) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, served on Granville William Smith IV. (Washington, S) |
| Filing 4 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by People of the State of California. (Washington, S) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 9/17/2018. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Kastilahn, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Granville William Smith, IV. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Granville William Smith, IV. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against People of the State of California by Granville William Smith, IV.(Kastilahn, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (HC) Smith v. People of the State of California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Granville William Smith, IV | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: People of the State of California | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
