Allen et al v. Santa Clara County Correctional Peace Officers Association et al
| Sean Allen, Bradley Taylor, Juanita Wiggins, Jennifer Bice and Stanley Graham |
| Mark Gregersen, Eric Banks, Arthur A. Krantz, Erich Shiners, Priscilla Winslow and Santa Clara County Correctional Peace Officers Association |
| 2:2018cv02230 |
| August 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Morrison C England |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
NON-RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/12/2018 ORDERING that it is inappropriate to relate or reassign the cases, and therefore declines to do so. (Zignago, K.)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of RELATED CASE 2:18-cv-01951-MCE-AC by Sean Allen, Jennifer Bice, Stanley Graham, Bradley Taylor, Juanita Wiggins. Attorney Mitchell, Jonathan F. added. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint in Martin v. California Teachers Association, et al., No. 2:18-cv-01951-MCE-AC)(Mitchell, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: The Court received the PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER (ECF No. 5). Pursuant to Local Rule 137(b), regarding the requirements for proper filing of a proposed order, you are required to email the proposed order (in Microsoft Word) to chambers in addition to filing the pdf version via the CM/ECF system. Pursuant to Local Rules 101 and 131(c), the definition for "signature", you may enter /s/ for signatures for all counsel. Please submit your proposed order today, in Microsoft Word format to: mceorders@caed.uscourts.gov. (Deutsch, S) |
| Filing 5 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Sean Allen, Jennifer Bice, Stanley Graham, Bradley Taylor, Juanita Wiggins for attorney Jonathan F. Mitchell to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Benbrook, Bradley) Modified on 8/21/2018 (Kastilahn, A). (REFER to #4 Pro Hace Vice Application for payment of fee) |
| Filing 4 (DISREGARD and REFER to #5 Pro Hace Vice Application and Proposed Order) PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Sean Allen, Jennifer Bice, Stanley Graham, Bradley Taylor, Juanita Wiggins for attorney Jonathan F. Mitchell to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-7820976) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Benbrook, Bradley) Modified on 8/20/2018 (Kastilahn, A). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (York, M) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Eric Banks, Mark Gregersen, Arthur A. Krantz, Santa Clara County Correctional Peace Officers Association, Erich Shiners, Priscilla Winslow* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Bradley A. Benbrook* *Benbrook Law Group* *400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2530* *Sacramento, CA 95814*. (York, M) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Stanley Graham, Jennifer Bice, Sean Allen, Bradley Taylor, Juanita Wiggins. Attorney Benbrook, Bradley A. added. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0972-7814196) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Benbrook, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
