Burlingame v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| Faith Burlingame |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., TransUnion, LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv02235 |
| August 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Deborah Barnes |
| William B Shubb |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/9/2018 IT IS SO ORDERED the deadline for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's complaint is hereby EXTENDED to 11/16/2018. No other deadlines shall be affected by this Order. (Reader, L)
|
| Filing 16 JT MOTION for EXTENSION of TIME to FILE ANSWER re #1 Complaint, and [Proposed] Order by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Givental, Alisa) Modified on 10/9/2018 (Kirksey Smith, K). |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 8/27/2018, answer due 9/17/2018. (Gale, Elliot) |
| Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Woo, Donna) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Attorney Woo, Donna added.(Woo, Donna) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION to Extend Response Deadline by No More than 28 Days by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Attorney Givental, Alisa A. added. (Givental, Alisa) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to #1 Complaint by Equifax Information Services, LLC. Attorney Quinn, Thomas Patrick added. (Quinn, Thomas) Modified on 9/11/2018 (Kastilahn, A). |
| Filing 10 ANSWER by TransUnion, LLC.(Miller, Debra) |
|
Filing 9
PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/28/2018 ORDERING Attorney Debra A. Miller to appear for Trans Union, LLC. (Reader, L)
|
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant TransUnion, LLC. (Booth, Eileen) |
| Filing 7 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by TransUnion, LLC for attorney Debra A. Miller to appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorney Booth, Eileen T. added. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-7835650) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Proposed Order)(Booth, Eileen) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 8/20/2018, answer due 9/10/2018. (Gale, Elliot) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: TransUnion, LLC served on 8/20/2018, answer due 9/10/2018. (Gale, Elliot) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. served on 8/20/2018, answer due 9/10/2018. (Gale, Elliot) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/11/2019, at 01:30 PM, in Courtroom 5 (WBS), before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (York, M) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., TransUnion, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Elliot Gale* *3017 Douglas Blvd.* *Suite 200* *Roseville, CA 95661*. (York, M) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., TransUnion, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. by Faith Burlingame. Attorney Gale, Elliot added. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0972-7815964) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gale, Elliot) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
