Pomponio v. Kareem Auto Sales, Inc. et al
| Meryl Pomponio |
| Kareem Auto Sales, Inc. and Charles C. Bell, Incorporated |
| 2:2018cv02320 |
| August 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| John A Mendez |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER by Kareem Auto Sales, Inc.. Attorney Rochelle, John Dumas added. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Rochelle, John) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Charles C. Bell, Incorporated served on 8/27/2018, answer due 9/17/2018. (Malakauskas, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Kareem Auto Sales, Inc. served on 8/31/2018, answer due 9/21/2018. (Malakauskas, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Charles C. Bell, Incorporated, Kareem Auto Sales, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Daniel Malakauskas* *7345 S. Durango Drive* *Suite B-107-240* *Las Vegas, NV 89113*. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Meryl Pomponio. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7831241) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Malakauskas, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
