(PC) Cassells v. Villa et al
| Keith M. Cassells and Keith Michael Cassells |
| Nadine N. Villa, Terry Fowler, Vijay Desai, John Garcia, Rhonda Skipper-Doha and Nina Starr |
| 2:2018cv02457 |
| September 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| John A Mendez |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge, this case has been assigned to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. The new case number is: 2:18-cv-02457-JAM-DB (PC). (Huang, H) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case, served on Keith Michael Cassells. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 4 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Keith Michael Cassells. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/15/2018 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Coll, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Keith M. Cassells. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Keith M. Cassells. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Keith M. Cassells.(Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
