Johnson v. Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 2:2018cv02460
Filed: September 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J Mueller
Referring Judge: Kendall J Newman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/9/2018 ORDERING this action is STAYED except as set forth herein and all previously set deadlines and hearings are VACATED pending further order of the court. The parties are directed to promptly meet and confer to discuss settlement of this action. If the parties have not been able to informally reach a settlement within 45 days, the parties shall initiate participation in the court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program. No later than 14 days after completion of the VDRP session, the parties shall jointly file their VDRP Completion Report. (cc: VDRP)(Washington, S)
October 2, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Cathy L. Arias on behalf of Starbucks Corporation. Attorney Arias, Cathy L. added. (Arias, Cathy)
October 2, 2018 Filing 8 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Starbucks Corporation. (Zong, Julie)
October 2, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Starbucks Corporation. (Zong, Julie)
October 2, 2018 Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (Zong, Julie)
October 2, 2018 Filing 5 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Starbucks Corporation. Attorney Zong, Julie Yin added.(Zong, Julie)
September 26, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: All Defendants. (Carson, Christina)
September 10, 2018 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 1/17/2019, at 02:30 PM, in Courtroom 3 (KJM), before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (York, M)
September 10, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Starbucks Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Christina Michelle Carson* *P.O. Box 262490* *9845 Erma Rd., Suite 300* *San Diego, CA 92131*. (York, M)
September 10, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Scott Johnson. Attorney Carson, Christina Michelle added. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0972-7856630) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Carson, Christina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Represented By: Christina Michelle Carson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Michelle D. Jew
Represented By: Julie Yin Zong
Represented By: Patrick Michael Callahan
Represented By: Arthur Slezak Gaus
Represented By: Cathy L. Arias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?