Johnson v. First California Investments et al
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Defendant: First California Investments and Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 2:2018cv02472
Filed: September 11, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Kendall J Newman
Referring Judge: Troy L Nunley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2018 Filing 13 ANSWER by First California Investments.(King, Daniel)
October 5, 2018 Filing 12 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Answer by First California Investments. Attorney King, Daniel Adam added. (King, Daniel)
October 2, 2018 Filing 11 AMENDED #6 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Starbucks Corporation . (Zong, Julie) Modified on 10/2/2018 (Kastilahn, A).
October 2, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Cathy L. Arias on behalf of Starbucks Corporation. Attorney Arias, Cathy L. added. (Arias, Cathy)
October 2, 2018 Filing 9 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Starbucks Corporation. (Zong, Julie)
October 2, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Starbucks Corporation. (Zong, Julie)
October 2, 2018 Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (Zong, Julie)
October 2, 2018 Filing 6 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Starbucks Corporation. Attorney Zong, Julie Yin added.(Zong, Julie)
September 24, 2018 Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: First California Investments served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (Carson, Christina)
September 24, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Starbucks Corporation served on 9/14/2018, answer due 10/5/2018. (Carson, Christina)
September 11, 2018 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (York, M)
September 11, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *First California Investments, Starbucks Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Christina Michelle Carson* *P.O. Box 262490* *9845 Erma Rd., Suite 300* *San Diego, CA 92131*. (York, M)
September 11, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Scott Johnson. Attorney Carson, Christina Michelle added. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0972-7859161) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Carson, Christina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. First California Investments et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Represented By: Christina Michelle Carson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First California Investments
Represented By: Daniel Adam King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Cathy L. Arias
Represented By: Julie Yin Zong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?