Mayhew-Murphy v. Safeway Inc. et al
Dianna Mayhew-Murphy |
Richard Lopez and Safeway Inc. |
2:2018cv02630 |
September 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
John A Mendez |
Kendall J Newman |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/1/2018 DISMISSING without Prejudice Plaintiff's 5th Cause of Action [Retaliation in Violation of the Family Medical Leave Act] and REMANDING the remainder of Plaintiff's action to Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Sacramento. The parties shall bear their own attorneys fees and costs associated with the dismissal and remand. Certified Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (York, M) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissing Fifth Claim and Remanding Action to Superior Court by Richard Lopez, Safeway Inc.. (Creason, Joe) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Safeway Inc.. (Creason, Joe) |
Filing 2 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Order re Filing Requirements, #3 VDRP) (York, M) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento Superior Court, case number 34-2018-00239038 by All Defendants. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0972-7889798) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Creason, Joe) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.