(PS) Lorretz et al v. California@GALoan450D002 et al
| Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz, Joel Dennis Wallach and Turuche Lorretz |
| California@GALoan450D002, California@GALoanChristopherGrimmettGA020, California@GALoanGATE010 and California@GALoan4SOD002 |
| 2:2018cv02666 |
| October 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| John A Mendez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 MOTION to Add Another Five Pages Already Demurred by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 28 MOTION Plaintiffs to Appear in Court by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 27 MOTION to Set Calendar Date to Re-Open Case by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 26 MOTION plaintiff complained to Ms. Eichorn by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 25 MOTION to Discuss with the Court by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 24
JUDGMENT dated *11/14/2018* pursuant to order signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/13/2018. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/13/2018 DENYING #10 Motion, ADOPTING #11 Findings and Recommendations in full, and DISMISSING this action for lack of jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #23 Order and #24 Judgment, served on Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 22 MOTION to agree as to acceptable service by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 21 MOTION to speak to Judges in court after both Judges were called by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 20 MOTION after plaintiff calls both judges by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 19 MOTION to order defendant to pay the plaintiff and exhibits by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 18 Plaintiff Motion Accuses Unknown Worker of Not Proper Entrys in this Case by Plaintiff Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for STATUS HEARING as being kidnapped plaintiffs became worse in Sacramento by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for HEARING about online Sacramento Police Report from Plaintiff by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 15 OBJECTIONS by Plaintiff Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz to #11 Findings and Recommendations. (Coll, A) Modified on 11/1/2018 (Coll, A). |
| Filing 14 MOTION to answer plaintiff today by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Huang, H) Modified on 10/30/2018 (Streeter, J). |
| Filing 13 NOTICE from Plaintiff Warning motions after and before plaintiff ask here Federal Bureau of Investigation today answer did Mrs. and Mr. Smith break laws when they invited this student into their house by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to schedule plaintiff hearing date to answer question where did the Federal Courts delete the entire docket number and text to by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Coll, A) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/22/2018 ORDERING Motions #3 , #5 , #6 , #8 and #9 are DENIED, as the court lacks jurisdiction over this matter. RECOMMENDING that that this action be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Also ORDERING that all pleading, discovery, and motion practice in this action are STAYED pending resolution of the findings and recommendations. With the exception of objections to the findings and recommendations and any non-frivolous motions for emergency relief, the court will not entertain or respond to any motions and other filings until the findings and recommendations are resolved. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations.(Washington, S) Modified on 10/23/2018 (Washington, S).
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #11 Findings and Recommendations (Motion) served on Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Washington, S) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Sapena FBI Directors by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to claim plaintiff did exparte arrive properly at Federal Judge Delaney's Courtroom by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz (Coll, A) |
| Filing 8 PLAINTIFF MOTION to Ex Parte Set this Case for Hearing by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 7 Tho the plaintiff is a target of Kushners motion to add these nine pages by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to meet with the judges by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz.(Kastilahn, A) (Main Document 6 replaced on 10/17/2018) (Zignago, K.). |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Meet with Judges by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Huang, H) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/3/2018 GRANTING #2 Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis; no later than 10/17/2018, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Reader, L)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order, served on Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to add three pages of Defendant causing harm to all Plaintiffs by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Diana Lee Wallach Lorretz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kaminski, H) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
