Soto v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
| Christopher Soto |
| Equifax Information Services, LLC, OneMain Financial Services, Inc. and OneMain Financial Services |
| 2:2018cv02680 |
| October 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to respond to the Complaint by OneMain Financial Services. Attorney Givental, Alisa A. ADDED. (Givental, Alisa) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 10/12/2018, answer due 11/2/2018. (Gale, Elliot) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Equifax Information Services, LLC, OneMain Financial Services, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Elliot Gale* *Sagaria Law, P.C.* *3017 Douglas Blvd., Suite 200* *Roseville, CA 95661*. (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services, LLC, OneMain Financial Services, Inc. by Christopher Soto. Attorney Gale, Elliot added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7900148) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gale, Elliot) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
