(HC) Jorgenson v. People of California
Petitioner: Ba Shay Edward Jorgenson
Respondent: People of California
Case Number: 2:2018cv02693
Filed: October 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K Delaney
Referring Judge: William B Shubb
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2018 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge, this case has been assigned to Senior Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. The new case number is: 2:18-cv-2693-WBS-CKD (HC). (Coll, A)
October 30, 2018 SERVICE BY MAIL: 9 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Ba Shay Edward Jorgenson. (Coll, A)
October 29, 2018 Filing 8 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Ba Shay Edward Jorgenson. (Coll, A)
October 10, 2018 Filing 7 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: Petition served on Tami Krenzin pursuant to #5 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition. (Yin, K)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/10/2018. (cc; Tami Krenzin) (Yin, K)
October 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/10/2018 GRANTING petitioner's #2 motion to proceed IFP and DIRECTING respondent to file a response to petition within 60 days. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order, a copy of the petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General.(cc: Tami Krenzin) (Yin, K)
October 10, 2018 SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition served on Ba Shay Edward Jorgenson. (Yin, K)
October 4, 2018 Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED: Consent or Decline due by 11/8/2018. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Jessen, A)
October 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/4/2018. New Case Number 2:18-cv-02693-CKD (HC). Old Case Number 1:18-cv-01344-JDP (HC). (Jessen, A)
October 4, 2018 SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #3 Order served on Ba Shay Edward Jorgenson. (Jessen, A)
October 1, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Ba Shay Edward Jorgenson. (Jessen, A)
October 1, 2018 Filing 1 (2254) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against People of California by Ba Shay Edward Jorgenson. (Jessen, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Jorgenson v. People of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: People of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ba Shay Edward Jorgenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?