Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Foote et al
| Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
| Michael M. Foote and Neta I. Rausa |
| 2:2018cv02763 |
| October 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Neta I. Rausa on 10/26/2018, Answer due 12/26/2018 (Ganji, Chakameh) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Michael M. Foote on 10/26/2018, Answer due 12/26/2018 (Ganji, Chakameh) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Michael M. Foote, Neta I. Rausa* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Chakameh Ganji* *Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP* *633 West Fifth Street, 47th Floor* *Los Angeles, CA 90071*. (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (Ganji, Chakameh) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Ganji, Chakameh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT-in-Interpleader against Michael M. Foote, Neta I. Rausa by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Attorney Ganji, Chakameh added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7917359) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - H)(Ganji, Chakameh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
