Pervez v. Bacerra et al
Plaintiff: Shafak Pervez
Defendant: Xavier Bacerra, Brent E. Orick, California Department of Justice and County of Sacramento
Case Number: 2:2018cv02793
Filed: October 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J Mueller
Referring Judge: Kendall J Newman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2018 Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: County of Sacramento served on 11/15/2018, answer due 12/6/2018. (Patterson, Kellan)
November 14, 2018 Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *County of Sacramento* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Kellan S. Patterson* *Law Office of Kellan S. Patterson* *770 L Street, Suite 950* *Sacramento, California 95814*. (Reader, L)
November 14, 2018 Filing 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Shafak Pervez.(Patterson, Kellan)
October 18, 2018 Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: All Defendants. (Patterson, Kellan)
October 18, 2018 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/28/2019, at 02:30 PM, in Courtroom 3 (KJM), before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (York, M)
October 18, 2018 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Xavier Bacerra, California Department of Justice, Brent E. Orick* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Kellan Steven Patterson* *Law Office of Kellan Patterson* *770 L Street, Suite 950* *Sacramento, CA 95814*. (York, M)
October 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Shafak Pervez. Attorney Patterson, Kellan Steven added. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0972-7924048) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Patterson, Kellan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pervez v. Bacerra et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Xavier Bacerra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brent E. Orick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Sacramento
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shafak Pervez
Represented By: Kellan Steven Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?