(PC) Mehmood v. United States et al
| Yasir Mehmood |
| U.S. Attorney General and United States |
| 2:2018cv02873 |
| October 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for 90-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to file amended complaint re #5 Order by Yasir Mehmood. (Kaminski, H) Modified on 12/12/2018 (Plummer, M). |
Filing 5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/21/18 ORDERING plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall file a first amended complaint within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order, Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings served on Yasir Mehmood. (Plummer, M) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Yasir Mehmood. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 12/3/2018. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Coll, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Yasir Mehmood. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Yasir Mehmood. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Yasir Mehmood.(Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
