Hopson v. Waterloo Liquors, Inc. et al
| Cynthia Hopson |
| Theresa M. Peluso, Katherine J. Elsholz, Waterloo Liquors, Inc. and Waterloo Liquors, Inc. Doing business as Waterloo Liquors |
| 2:2018cv02883 |
| October 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Waterloo Liquors, Inc.. (Morin, Richard) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Waterloo Liquors, Inc..(Morin, Richard) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Richard John Morin on behalf of Waterloo Liquors, Inc.. Attorney Morin, Richard John added. (Morin, Richard) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Katherine J. Elsholz, Theresa M. Peluso, Waterloo Liquors, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Daniel Joseph Malakauskas* *Malakauskas Law Firm* *7345 South Durango Drive, Suite B-107-240* *Las Vegas, NV 89113*. (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Cynthia Hopson. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7942579) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Malakauskas, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
