(PC) Cardenas Flores v. Flores Ojeda
Juan Luis Cardenas Flores |
Jose Guadalupe Flores and Jose Guadalupe Flores Ojeda |
2:2018cv02938 |
November 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Kendall J Newman |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Juan Luis Cardenas Flores. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 5 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Juan Luis Cardenas Flores. (York, M) |
Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/26/2018 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, a completed request to proceed ifp; the Clerk shall send plaintiff a new ifp application; and plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days, a certified copy of his jail trust account statement. (Yin, K) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and ifp application served on Juan Luis Cardenas Flores. (Yin, K) |
Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 12/13/2018. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Coll, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Juan Luis Cardenas Flores. (Coll, A) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Juan Luis Cardenas Flores. (Coll, A) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Jose Guadalupe Flores by Juan Luis Cardenas Flores.(Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.