C.H.,et al v. United States of America
| Cindy Alejandriz, C. H. and Juan Hurtado |
| United States of America |
| 2:2018cv02964 |
| November 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JOINT STIPULATION to Extend Time to Response to Complaint by United States of America. Attorney Kim, Chi Soo added. (Kim, Chi Soo) Modified on 1/4/2019 (Reader, L). |
Filing 6
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/19/2018 GRANTING #5 Motion to Appoint CINDY ALEJANDRIZ as the guardian ad litem for C.H. (York, M)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to APPOINT GUARDIAN AD LITEM and PROPOSED ORDER by Cindy Alejandriz, C. H. (Roussas, John) Modified on 11/14/2018 (Krueger, M). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *United States of America* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *John G. Roussas* *Cutter Law P.C.* *401 Watt Ave* *Sacramento, CA 95864*. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Plaintiffs. (Roussas, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Plaintiffs. Attorney Roussas, John G. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7963442) (Roussas, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
