Jamara v. Keyview Labs, Inc.
| Kail Jamara |
| Keyview Labs, Inc. and Keyview Labs, Inc. Doing business as Procera Health |
| 2:2018cv03040 |
| November 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/11/2019.: Pursuant to the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (ECF No. #5 ) and FRCP 41(a)(1), this case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Kail Jamara. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Kail Jamara. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Keyview Labs, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Todd M. Friedman* *Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, PC* *21550 Oxnard Street, Suite 780* *Woodland Hills, California 91367*. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Keyview Labs, Inc. by Kail Jamara. Attorney Bacon, Adrian R. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-7983270) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bacon, Adrian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
