Wagner v. County of Plumas et al
Plaintiff: Tiffany Wagner
Defendant: County of Plumas, Gregory J. Hagwood and Brandon Compton
Case Number: 2:2018cv03105
Filed: November 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Dennis M Cota
Referring Judge: Kimberly J Mueller
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2019 Filing 9 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to County of Plumas on 1/16/2019, Answer due 3/18/2019 (Chang, Calvin)
January 22, 2019 Filing 8 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Gregory J. Hagwood on 1/16/2019, Answer due 3/18/2019 (Chang, Calvin)
January 22, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Brandon Compton served on 1/17/2019, answer due 2/7/2019. (Chang, Calvin)
December 31, 2018 Filing 6 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Margaret E. Long for County of Plumas and Gregory J. Hagwood (Uhrhammer, Amanda) Modified on 1/3/2019 (Kaminski, H).
December 31, 2018 Filing 5 ANSWER with Jury Demand by County of Plumas, Gregory J. Hagwood. Attorney Uhrhammer, Amanda added.(Uhrhammer, Amanda)
November 30, 2018 Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference SET for 4/11/2019 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Mena-Sanchez, L)
November 30, 2018 Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Brandon Compton, County of Plumas, Gregory J. Hagwood* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Calvin Chang* *Law Office Of Calvin Chang* *980 - 9th Street, 16th Floor* *Sacramento, CA 95814*. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
November 30, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Tiffany Wagner (Chang, Calvin)
November 30, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brandon Compton, County of Plumas, Gregory J. Hagwood by Tiffany Wagner. Attorney Chang, Calvin added. (Filing fee $400.00 Receipt Number 0972-7994094) (Chang, Calvin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wagner v. County of Plumas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Wagner
Represented By: Calvin Chang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Plumas
Represented By: Margaret E. Long
Represented By: Amanda Uhrhammer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gregory J. Hagwood
Represented By: Margaret E. Long
Represented By: Amanda Uhrhammer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brandon Compton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?