Sream, Inc. et al v. Kahlon
| RooR International BV and Sream, Inc. |
| Gurmukh Kahlon |
| 2:2018cv03125 |
| December 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| William B Shubb |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Gurmukh Kahlon served on 1/16/2019. (Vakil, Imran) Modified on 1/31/2019 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 3 TRADEMARK NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED as to Trademark #1:* 3675839 * * 9/1/2009 * * RooR International BV * Trademark #2:* 2307176 * * 1/11/2000 * * RooR International BV * Trademark #3:* 2235638 * * 3/30/1999 * * RooR International BV * ; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/15/2019, at 01:30 PM, in Courtroom 5 (WBS), before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Trademark Report, #3 VDRP) (York, M) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Gurmukh Kahlon* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Imran F. Vakil* *245 Fischer Avenue* *Suite C3* *Costa Mesa, CA 92626*. (York, M) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gurmukh Kahlon by Sream, Inc., RooR International BV. Attorney Vakil, Imran F. added. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0972-7998130) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vakil, Imran) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
