(PC) Joseph v. Horwitz et al
| Alonzo Joseph |
| R. Hawkins, E. Horwitz and Vaughn |
| 2:2018cv03155 |
| December 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| William B Shubb |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 APPEAL PROCESSED to Ninth Circuit re #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Alonzo Joseph. Notice of Appeal filed *1/30/2019*, Complaint filed *12/6/2018* and Appealed Order / Judgment filed *1/7/2019*. ** *Fee Status: Not Paid - Billed* Bill for fees due sent to *Alonzo Joseph*. (Attachments: #1 Appeal Information, #2 Bill for Appeal Fee) (York, M) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #11 Appeal Processed to USCA served on Alonzo Joseph. (York, M) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of APPEAL by Alonzo Joseph as to #9 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations, denying Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, and directing to pay the $400 filing fee within 30 days. (York, M) |
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/4/19 ADOPTING #6 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP; and DIRECTING plaintiff to pay the $400 filing fee within 30 days of the date of this order. (Coll, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations served on Alonzo Joseph. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 8 OBJECTIONS to #6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS by Plaintiff Alonzo Joseph. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 7 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Alonzo Joseph. (Kaminski, H) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/12/18 DIRECTING the clerk to randomly assign a district judge. Senior Judge William B. Shubb added. It is further RECOMMENDED that #2 Motion to Proceed IFP be Denied and plaintiff be ordered to pay the filing fee. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. New Case Number: 2:18-cv-3155-WBS-KJN (PC). (Coll, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order and Findings and Recommendations served on Alonzo Joseph. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 5 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Alonzo Joseph. (York, M) |
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Alonzo Joseph, CDC K-62045 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (TEXT ONLY) (Plummer, M) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 4 Notice re TRUST STATEMENT NEEDED,, served on Alonzo Joseph. (Plummer, M) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/10/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Coll, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Alonzo Joseph. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Alonzo Joseph. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Alonzo Joseph.(Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
