(SS) Swahn v. Commissioner of Social Security
Roger Swahn |
Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2018cv03172 |
December 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Kendall J Newman |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Social Security Administration. Attorney Jenkins, Chantal added. (Jenkins, Chantal) |
Filing 5 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Roger Swahn. (Saltzen, Paul) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Social Security Administration served on 12/11/2018. (Saltzen, Paul) Modified on 1/9/2019 (Benson, A.). |
Filing 3 SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL Consent or Decline due by 3/14/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 SS Consent Form) (Becknal, R) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Social Security Administration* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Paul Saltzen* *Law Office of Paul Saltzen* *P.O. Box 940* *Shingle Springs, CA 95682*. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration by Roger Swahn. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8007228) (Saltzen, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.