(PC) Ento v. State of California et al
| Christian David Ento |
| Halodol, State of California, Delgado and Steens |
| 2:2018cv03191 |
| December 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Not in Custody: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider sent to Christian David Ento. Notice of Change of Address due by 3/14/2019. (Huang, H) |
| MAIL RETURNED as NIC: #4 Order sent to Christian David Ento. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/14/18 DIRECTING plaintiff to submit filing fee or IFP Form with 30 days and to submit his inmate trust account statement within 60 days. (Coll, A)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and IFP Form served on Christian David Ento. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/17/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Coll, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Christian David Ento. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Christian David Ento. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Christian David Ento.(Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
