(PC) Ento v. CETA State Prison et al
Plaintiff: Christian David Ento
Defendant: Ben Cyao, Magis Perctie, CETA State Prison and Jerg Clycie
Case Number: 2:2018cv03193
Filed: December 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K Delaney
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2019 MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, RTS, no such number, unable to forward: #4 Order, sent to Christian David Ento. Notice of Change of Address due by 4/15/2019. (Reader, L)
January 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/22/2019 DENYING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and ORDERING Plaintiff to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP and a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement. (Henshaw, R)
January 23, 2019 SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and IFP application served on Christian David Ento. (Henshaw, R)
January 4, 2019 RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents re-served on Christian David Ento to 1801 G Street, Sacramento, CA 95811. (Henshaw, R)
January 3, 2019 MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, Not in Custody: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider sent to Christian David Ento. Notice of Change of Address due by 3/14/2019. (Huang, H)
December 13, 2018 Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/17/2019. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Coll, A)
December 13, 2018 SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Christian David Ento. (Coll, A)
December 12, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Christian David Ento. (Coll, A)
December 12, 2018 Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Christian David Ento.(Coll, A)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Ento v. CETA State Prison et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ben Cyao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Magis Perctie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CETA State Prison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jerg Clycie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christian David Ento
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?