R & B of the Pacific, Inc. v. Price et al
| R & B of the Pacific, Inc. |
| Pro Sport Installations LLC and Alan Price |
| 2:2018cv03257 |
| December 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Alan Price served on 1/13/2019, answer due 2/4/2019. (Hubbard, Scottlynn) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Pro Sport Installations LLC served on 1/13/2019, answer due 2/4/2019. (Hubbard, Scottlynn) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/9/2019 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Alan Price, Pro Sport Installations LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Scottlynn J. Hubbard, IV* *Disabled Advocacy Group, APLCS* *12 Williamsburg Lane* *Chico, CA 95926*. (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by R & B of the Pacific, Inc.. Attorney Hubbard, Scottlynn J. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8032013) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hubbard, Scottlynn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
