United States of America v. Approximately $28,000.00 in U.S. Currency
| United States of America |
| Approximately $28,000.00 in U.S. Currency |
| 2:2018mc00057 |
| April 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/3/18. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/28/2018 ORDERING the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 10/3/2018.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
8
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/30/18: The deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be extended to September 3, 2018. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
6
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/2/2018 ORDERING that the deadline by which the U.S. shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture is EXTENDED to 8/1/2018. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
4
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/7/2018 EXTENDING the deadline by which the United States shall berequired to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture to 7/2/2018. (Hunt, G)
|
|
Filing
2
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 4/30/18, ORDERING that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture is EXTENDED to 6/1/2018. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $28,000.00 in U.S. Currency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Kevin Christopher Khasigian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Approximately $28,000.00 in U.S. Currency | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
